The Role of the Communication Discipline at Technical Faculties

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonest.204

Keywords:

Collegial Relations, Communication, Student Life, Technical Faculties, Transition

Abstract

Students newly admitted to the university must familiarize with the higher education system, must survive to the transition from pre-university system and adapt to the style of learning/organization/evaluation, basically have to adjust to student life. This change from the pre-university system to the university one has a major influence on the young person on several aspects. Some concern personal life, because it is possible for him to access a university in another city or country and then break up with his friends and his current partner. This factor, among many others, can influence school dropout. Thus, in first years of study, the Communication discipline was introduced in the faculties with a technical profile, precisely to improve and facilitate communication in the new environment in which young people develop and to encourage them to work in a team. The paper presents the analysis of the way in which the aforementioned discipline influences interpersonal communication and obviously friendship relations between new colleagues. Two questionnaires were proposed: one for initial evaluation and one after the semester passed, completed by students at the first and at last seminar. The results showed that this discipline is really important and brings added value to collegial relations.

Author Biographies

Mihaela Andrei, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Romania

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication

Alina Pricopie-Filip, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Romania

Department of Electronics and Telecommunication

References

Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2006). The Experience of Time at Work: Relationship to Communication Load, Job Satisfaction, and Interdepartmental Communication. Communication Studies, 57(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970600845974

Depaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–40). McGraw-Hill.

Duncan, S. (1969). Nonverbal communication. Psychological Bulletin, 72(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027795

Giri, V. N., & Pavan Kumar, B. (2010). Assessing the impact of organizational communication on job satisfaction and job performance. Psychological Studies, 55(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0013-6

Goris, J. R. (2007). Effects of satisfaction with communication on the relationship between individual‐job congruence and job performance/satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 26(8), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710777255

Hall, J. A., Horgan, T. G., & Murphy, N. A. (2019). Nonverbal Communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103145

Jonsson, C., & Hall, M. (2003). Communication: An Essential Aspect of Diplomacy. International Studies Perspectives, 4(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.402009

Julia T. Wood. (2008). Communications in our lives. Ed. Cengage Learning.

L’Etang, J. (2009). Public Relations and Diplomacy in a Globalized World: An Issue of Public Communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347633

Pincus, J. D. (1986). COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION, JOB SATISFACTION, AND JOB PERFORMANCE. Human Communication Research, 12(3), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00084.x

Wood, J. T. (2015). Interpersonal Communication: Everyday Encounters. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.ro/books?id=IInCBAAAQBAJ

Downloads

Published

2024-06-10

Issue

Section

Science