The Use of GIS for Land Use Planning: Recommendations for PPGIS in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonest.220Keywords:
PPGIS, Land use planning, public participationAbstract
GIS (Geographic Information Systems) provide the ability to present multifaceted data in a clear and understandable manner, enabling various stakeholders to be informed and actively participate in discussions about future changes to land use. The use of GIS allows for the analysis of complex spatial and temporal data, aiding in community planning and development, resource conservation, and efficient land utilization. While GIS resources have become more accessible in recent years, land use planners in the US have not fully utilized this tool in regards to engaging the public and gaining their feedback in the planning process. In contrast, European countries like Finland and Poland continuously use PPGIS (Public Participation Geographic Information Systems) and publish their processes frequently. A literature review of PPGIS publications from 2015-2023 provides an overview of the limitations of PPGIS and the barriers for use, including lack of participation and limited funding. A review of the literature, as well as an analysis of the impact of the COVID pandemic, are used to determine best practices for incorporating PPGIS into land use planning processes in the US. Recommendations for improving the use of PPGIS in the US include utilizing training programs, active participation in community meetings, and using multiple methods to engage the public.References
Babelon, I., Ståhle, A., & Balfors, B. (2017). Toward Cyborg PPGIS: exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, Sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(8), 1366-1390.
Bąkowska-Waldmann, E. (2023). Residents’ experiential knowledge and its importance for decision-making processes in spatial planning: A PPGIS based study. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(3), 102.
Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., & Kaczmarek, T. (2021). The use of PPGIS: Towards reaching a meaningful public participation in spatial planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(9), 581.
Brown, K. (2004). Employability of Geography Graduates in the GIS and GI-related fields. Planet, 13(1), 18-19.
Brown, G. (2012). An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied Geography, 34, 289-294.
Brown, G. (2017). A review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Transactions in GIS, 21(1), 39-56.
Brown, G., & Fagerholm, N. (2015). Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, 119-133.
Brown, A., Hellem, T., Schreiber, J., Buerhaus, P., & Colbert, A. (2022). Suicide and altitude: A systematic review of global literature. Public Health Nursing, 39(5), 1167-1179.
Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122-136.
Brown, G. G., & Reed, P. (2009). Public participation GIS: a new method for use in National Forest planning. Forest Science, 55(2), 166-182.
Brown, D. G., Riolo, R., Robinson, D. T., North, M., & Rand, W. (2005). Spatial process and data models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7(1), 25-47.
Buendía, A. V. P., Albert, M. Y. P., & Giné, D. S. (2019). PPGIS and public use in protected areas: A case study in the Ebro Delta Natural Park, Spain. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(6), 244.
Buendía, A. V. P., Albert, M. Y. P., & Giné, D. S. (2021). Online Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) as a landscape and public use management tool: a case study from the Ebro Delta Natural Park (Spain). Landscape Online, 93-93.
Clement, J. M., & Cheng, A. S. (2011). Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied Geography, 31(2), 393-400.
Denwood, T., Huck, J. J., & Lindley, S. (2022). Effective PPGIS in spatial decision‐making: Reflecting participant priorities by illustrating the implications of their choices. Transactions in GIS, 26(2), 867-886.
Engen, S., Runge, C., Brown, G., Fauchald, P., Nilsen, L., & Hausner, V. (2018). Assessing local acceptance of protected area management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 27-34.
Gottwald, S., Laatikainen, T. E., & Kyttä, M. (2016). Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(12), 2321-2338.
Jankowski, P., Forss, K., Czepkiewicz, M., Saarikoski, H., & Kahila, M. (2022). Assessing impacts of PPGIS on urban land use planning: Evidence from Finland and Poland. European Planning Studies, 30(8), 1529-1548.
Johnson, M. S., Adams, V. M., Byrne, J., & Harris, R. M. (2022). The benefits of Q+ PPGIS for coupled human-natural systems research: A systematic review. Ambio, 51(8), 1819-1836.
Kacaw, L., & Tsai, B. W. (2023). The application of PPGIS to telecoupling research: A case study of the agricultural landscape transformation in an indigenous village in Taiwan. Sustainability, 15(2), 1577.
Kantola, S. (2021). The participation of citizens in land use planning and decision-making in Northern areas–the potential of PPGIS in increasing interaction. Nordia Geographical Publications, 50(3), 1-57.
Kantola, S., Fagerholm, N., & Nikula, A. (2023). Utilization and implementation of PPGIS in land use planning and decision-making from the perspective of organizations. Land Use Policy, 127, 106528.
Land Use and Building Act (1999). https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990132.pdf.
Lehto, C., Hedblom, M., Öckinger, E., & Ranius, T. (2022). Landscape usage by recreationists is shaped by availability: Insights from a national PPGIS survey in Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning, 227, 104519.
Li, W., Ornstein, K. A., Li, Y., & Liu, B. (2021). Barriers to learning a new technology to go online among older adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(11), 3051-3057.
Morse, W. C., Cox, C., & Anderson, C. J. (2020). Using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) to identify valued landscapes vulnerable to sea level rise. Sustainability, 12(17), 6711.
Nielsen-Pincus, M., Hall, T., Force, J. E., & Wulfhorst, J. D. (2010). Sociodemographic effects on place bonding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 443-454.
Nikula, A., Turunen, M., Bogadóttir, R., Markkula, I., & Kantola, S. (2020). PPGIS for a better understanding of peoples values: experiences from Finland and the Faroe Islands. In Sharing Knowledge for Land Use Management (pp. 70-85). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pocewicz, A., Nielsen‐Pincus, M., Brown, G., & Schnitzer, R. (2012). An evaluation of internet versus paper‐based methods for public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS, 16(1), 39-53.
Prado, C., Colectivo Salud y Justicia Ambiental, & Red de Ciudadanos para el Mejoramiento de las Comunidades. (2021). Border environmental justice PPGIS: Community-based mapping and public participation in eastern Tijuana, México. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1349.
Rall, E., Hansen, R., & Pauleit, S. (2019). The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 264-274.
Strickland-Munro, J., Kobryn, H., Brown, G., & Moore, S. A. (2016). Marine spatial planning for the future: Using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform the human dimension for large marine parks. Marine Policy, 73, 15-26.
Tang, Z., & Liu, T. (2016). Evaluating Internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) in environmental planning and management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(6), 1073-1090.
Valánszki, I., Jombach, S., Kovács, K. F., Abualhagag Ahmed, A., Mendez Garzón, F. A., & Balha, G. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services and local identity–A ppGIS case study from Budapest Metropolitan Region. In Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning, 6(1), 14.
Valánszki, I., Kristensen, L. S., Jombach, S., Ladányi, M., Filepné Kovács, K., & Fekete, A. (2022). Assessing relations between cultural ecosystem services, physical landscape features and accessibility in Central-Eastern Europe: A PPGIS empirical study from Hungary. Sustainability, 14(2), 754.
Wolf, I. D., Brown, G., & Wohlfart, T. (2018). Applying public participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform and manage visitor conflict along multi-use trails. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(3), 470-495.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology (IJonEST), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
